Archive for June, 2007


Jun

28

House and Senate Move to Restore “Cash Against Documents” Rule


Posted by at 6:30 pm on June 28, 2007
Category: Cuba SanctionsOFAC

Cuban StampThe House today adopted legislation that would roll back restrictive rules adopted by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) in February 2005 regarding shipments of agricultural goods to Cuba under the Trade Sanctions Reform Act of 2005 (“TSRA”). Under those rules, payment was required prior to the departure of the ships carrying the agricultural goods.

The language of TSRA only requires that payment be made in one of two ways: (i) “payment of cash in advance” or (ii) through financing by third-country (i.e. non-U.S. and non-Cuban) financial institutions. Because of Cuba’s credit standing and inability to obtain third-country financing facilities, most transactions have been structured as “payment of cash in advance.”

The statutory term “payment of cash in advance” does not specify in advance of what. Prior to February 2005, OFAC had taken the position that a standard “cash against documents” transaction complied with that
term.

In a “cash against documents” transaction, the seller delivers the goods to the shipper and obtains a negotiable bill of lading from the shipper. The Cuban buyer’s bank (usually either Paris-based Banque National de Paris or Société Générale) pays the seller upon presentation of the bill of lading. The bill of lading is then provided to the Cuban buyer by the French bank. That bill of lading authorizes the shipper to unload the cargo and permits the Cuban buyer to take possession of the cargo.

Under prevailing commercial case law, the delivery of a negotiable bill of lading is seen as equivalent to delivery of the goods themselves. Accordingly, payment in advance of obtaining the bill of lading was seen as complying with the statutory requirement of payment in advance.

Under the “cash against documents” method, the goods are usually shipped shortly after the U.S. seller obtains the bill of lading. Because of the short shipping distance from southern ports to Cuba the goods often arrived at the port in Cuba before the French bank has confirmed the issuance of the bill of lading and made payment to the seller’s account. For this reason, OFAC began to advise the sellers’ banks that the transactions did not conform to the TSRA “payment in advance” requirement. And in February 2005, it adopted rules requiring payment prior to the departure of the ship transporting the purchased goods.

The House bill would restore the “cash against documents” rule. The Bush administration recently threatened to veto any legislation that would “weaken” the current sanctions, and it is widely believed that this threat was specifically directed at plans to restore the “cash against documents” rule.

A bill was introduced in the Senate on June 21 that would also restore the “cash against documents” rule. That bill would also lift all restrictions on travel to Cuba. A copy of the Senate bill can be found here.

Permalink Comments (1)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Jun

27

New ITAR Firearms Export Exemption in the Works


Posted by at 6:08 pm on June 27, 2007
Category: Arms ExportDDTC

Air Marshal PracticeOfficer Ozzie Ossifer is patrolling in Vermont near the Canadian border when he witnesses a juvenile engage in an act of malicious criminal cow-tipping. He takes off after the delinquent who crosses the Canadian border. He follows the youth into Canada, his service revolver still firmly stored in his holster. Donuts and desk work have taken their toll on Officer Ossifer and the youth eludes him.

A bad day for the faithful law enforcement official becomes worse when he’s stopped by ICE as he attempts to cross back into the United States. He’s cuffed and taken away for having violated the Arms Export Control Act when he carried his service revolver into Canada without a license from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. The cow-tipper having escaped scot-free returns night after night to Vermont to terrorize the local bovine population while Officer Ossifer is on forced administrative leave.

“Nonsense,” you say. Surely the ITAR must have an exemption for this. Well, the ITAR does have an exemption for temporary exports of firearms in section 123.17, but that exemption would be of no avail to the officer in this case. Officer Ossifer made no declaration of the weapon and there was no customs inspection. Things look grim for our fictional Officer Ossifer.

However, the U.S. and Canada are working on an agreement that may protect future (and real) law enforcement officers that cross the Canadian border with their weapons. An article on the CTV website today revealed that Canada is considering a change in its Export and Import Permits Act to permit exempt imports and exports by law enforcement officers when they cross the U.S.-Canada border in the course of their official duties. Significantly this is said to be part of a reciprocal arrangement with the United States, although the United States has yet to announce that it is considering such a reciprocal arrangement.

The chief motivation appears not to be hot pursuit cases such as the one described above, but the U.S. Air Marshall program and its Canadian equivalent, the Canadian Air Carrier Protective Program. Section 123.17 of the ITAR doesn’t apply to U.S. air marshals, who instead can only export firearms without a license under section 123.18 and then only “if they are assigned abroad for extended duty.” It is, of course, safe to assume that the TSA and its air marshals have simply been ignoring the ITAR. If the CTV report is right, we can expect to see soon a revision of the ITAR to cover temporary exports of service weapons by law enforcement officers in the course of their official duties.

The Canadian Gazette notice of the proposed change in Canadian law can be found here.

Permalink Comments Off on New ITAR Firearms Export Exemption in the Works

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Jun

26

US-UK Treaty Details Begin to Leak Out


Posted by at 5:10 pm on June 26, 2007
Category: Arms ExportDDTC

FlagsAlthough the text of the Defense Trade Cooperation Treaty signed last week by Bush and Blair has not yet been released to the public, the Society of British Aerospace Companies has published a summary of key points of the treaty. The summary answers some of the preliminary questions that were raised by conflicting press accounts of the treaty that we previously reported here.

Of key interest are what items will be subject to the treaty. Apparently the answer to that is almost everything on the USML. According to the SABC summary:

All USML items, with a small number of exceptions for highly-sensitive technologies that will be agreed between the UK and US, will be included in the coverage of the treaty. Subject to final agreement, the exceptions are likely to relate to low-observable technology and countermeasures, “anti-tamper” technology and communication security technology.

Additionally, dual-use items on the U.S. Commerce Control List will not be subject to the treaty, whereas “dual use” items on the U.K. Strategic Export Control List would be subject to the treaty. The reason for the different treatment of U.S. and U.K. dual use items is not clear and is not explained in the summary.

The SBAC summary also provides some interesting details on the export of technical data. The treatment of technical data in the treaty will be the subject of a separate post.

Credit is due to Jim Bartlett at Northrop Grumman for finding the SBAC summary. When a text of the treaty is made available, we will post it here.

UPDATE:
SBAC removed the key points summary of the treaty from its website. We have fixed the link above to point to our archive of the key points document. You can also see that document by clicking here.

Permalink Comments (3)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Jun

25

Statutes of Limitations Easily Circumvented by BIS


Posted by at 11:04 pm on June 25, 2007
Category: BIS

Diaphragm PumpBIS recently released a Charging Letter, Settlement Agreement and Order pursuant to which pump maker Graco agreed to pay $97,000 to the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) to settle fifteen alleged violations of the Export Administration Regulations. The violations involved direct shipment of diaphragm pumps to locations requiring licenses as well as shipment of the pumps to distributors with knowledge that the distributor would reship the pumps without a license to destinations requiring a license.

The Settlement Agreement and the Order were dated June 22, 2007. The earliest violation occurred in 1999 and the latest violation in February 2002. All fifteen violations, accordingly, fell outside the relevant five-year statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2462.

So why, some of you might ask, would Graco agree to pay a $97,000 to BIS even though BIS would have no power to collect the fine in federal court? Simple. Graco agreed to pay the amount to avoid denial of export privileges which is not subject to the statute of limitations. The bottom line for exporters is that the threat of denial of export privileges can be used to obtain a fine from exporters that would otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations.

Permalink Comments (2)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Jun

22

Where the Flyin’-Fishes Play


Posted by at 4:26 pm on June 22, 2007
Category: OFAC

Bird FluThe Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) published today in the Federal Register a Final Rule amending the Burmese Sanctions Regulations. The amendment adds to those regulations a new § 537.527 which overrules the regulations’ prohibition of imports of Burmese-origin articles to permit the importation of “animals and specimens of Burmese origin, in sample quantities only, for bona fide scientific research and analysis purposes.” The importation will require a license, and licensing decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis.

The Federal Register notice provides no indication as to OFAC’s motivation for adopting the rule, but it seems to me that it is a speedy and laudable response to the recent outbreak of the H5N1 bird flu in Burma. The new rule will permit the importation, among other things, of birds and laboratory samples taken from birds in Burma in order to promote scientific research into the causes, prevention, treatment and eradication of bird flu.

It seems that OFAC can, from time to time at least, stop gnawing on the Cuba bone long enough to do something useful. Kudos to the agency officials who took this prompt action.

(The title is a reference to this guilty pleasure.)

Permalink Comments Off on Where the Flyin’-Fishes Play

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)