Archive for February, 2007


Feb

6

A Kim Jong-il Wind Blows on DPRK-Flagged Ships


Posted by at 8:08 pm on February 6, 2007
Category: OFAC

Pirates of PyongyangLast Friday, OFAC further amended its rules relating to “flag of convenience” ships registered in North Korea. Previously, OFAC had forbidden Americans from owning, leasing, operating or insuring North Korean flagged ships. Under the new rules, Americans may not obtain authorization for a vessel to fly a North Korean flag.

This amendment is presumably directed at ship registry services that assist third parties in obtaining registration for ships on the various open registries throughout the world such as Liberia, the Seychelles and North Korea. Although I could locate a number of companies on the Internet providing such services, such as this one, none of them appeared to be U.S.-based, so it doesn’t seem clear that the new rule will have wide impact on U.S. business.

I have to wonder, as well, why on earth a ship would want to fly a North Korean flag in the first place given the inevitable scrutiny such a flag is bound to attract. This is particularly true now given that paragraph 8(f) of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1718 arguably gives countries broader authority to board and inspect North Korean flag ships. Not surprisingly even North Korea is reluctant to have its own ships fly under the North Korean flag and prefers to register them on other open registries such as those of Cambodia and Tuvalu.

Permalink Comments Off on A Kim Jong-il Wind Blows on DPRK-Flagged Ships

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Feb

5

Food Additive Broker Burned in Missile Export Scheme


Posted by at 8:44 pm on February 5, 2007
Category: DDTC

Caldwell Perp WalkLast week a Portland, Oregon food additive broker learned the hard way that he should have stuck to MSG and not gotten involved in exporting silver-zinc batteries. It seems that the batteries in question are used to power the Hawk missile and were ultimately destined for Iran. So Robert Caldwell was arrested in a luxury hotel in San Antonio after he tried to buy the batteries from an undercover ICE agent on behalf of a U.K. citizen, still at large, who wanted them shipped to Iran by way of the Netherlands.

A copy of the ICE agent’s affidavit in support of the criminal complaint against Caldwell is interesting reading, not the least because of the ICE agent’s frequent and mistaken reference to the DDTC as “the ODTC.” According to the affidavit, Caldwell was attempting to buy the batteries on behalf of Christopher Tappin, a U.K. citizen and director of Brooklands Overseas Services. Caldwell contacted an undercover agent to arrange for a purchase of Eagle Pilcher Silver Zinc batteries GAP-4328. The agent then sent Caldwell a pro-forma invoice for the batteries indicating that export of the batteries without a DDTC license was prohibited. When Caldwell next spoke with the agent he expressed concern about the export restriction on the pro-forma invoice. Somehow or another (and we can only speculate here), the agent alleviated Caldwell’s concerns, since Caldwell sent to the agent a purchase order for the batteries, inaccurately describing them as “Tideland gap inert non-spillable reserve batteries.” The agent and Caldwell then met in a San Antonio hotel. During that meeting Caldwell gave the agent a check for the batteries, and, instead of the batteries, got a pair of handcuffs instead.

One can’t help but get the impression from the affidavit that Caldwell, more accustomed to dealing with Red Dye No. 6 than missile batteries, may have gotten in over his head and may well have had his well-founded anxieties about the export alleviated by the ICE undercover agent.

Nor is the USML status of the Eagle Picher batteries involved entirely clear. The affidavit claims that the batteries fall under Category IV(h) of the USML and then mistakenly asserts that this makes the batteries “significant military equipment.” Apparently the agent doesn’t know what those asterisks on the USML mean. But I’m not even certain that the batteries are appropriately placed in Category IV(h) which would require that they be specifically designed or modified for military use. If these batteries are still being sold, as they obviously are, they must have other uses than powering the discontinued Hawk missile. Of course, since Eagle-Picher lists its line of Silver Zinc batteries under its line of “defense and space power” products, I would counsel an export license even if the USML status of the batteries isn’t entirely clear.

Permalink Comments (1)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Feb

2

In Brightest Day, In Darkest Night


Posted by at 5:24 pm on February 2, 2007
Category: DDTC

What's in Your Laptop?Last week we were wondering about the origin of the name “Blue Lantern” for the pre-shipment and post-shipment verification program conducted by DDTC. Andrea Fekkes Dynes of General Dynamics, via “The Daily Bugle,” has an idea:

Last Friday’s Daily Bugle contained an article about State/DDTC’s Blue Lantern program [Daily Bugle, 26 Jan 2007, Item #10, Counsel Comment (R. Clifton Burns): “Beware My Power, Blue Lantern’s Light!”]. That article posed the question about the possible origin of the term “Blue Lantern.” One of our export compliance officials (who works in the UK) provides a possible answer: “It probably originates from the UK as, before about 1970, every police station in the UK had a blue lantern illuminated outside which signified to all the ‘strong arm of the law’.”

That seems a reasonable possibility, although I wonder whether anyone at DDTC had any familiarity with UK police stations during that period.

I’m beginning to suspect that it might actually be a reference to the comics. In an ODTC (yes, you remember the ODTC) presentation on the Blue Lantern program, there is a reference to three government wide end-use monitoring programs: Blue Lantern (ODTC), Golden Sentry (Department of Defense) and Green Lantern (Department of Commerce). The Sentry, in case you have forgotten, is a Marvel comics character whose clothing changes into the Golden Sentry suit when he undergoes the obligatory transformation from ordinary Robert Reynolds to a superhero.

The mystery thickens.

Permalink Comments (1)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Feb

1

What’s In Your Laptop?


Posted by at 10:27 pm on February 1, 2007
Category: BISDeemed Exports

What's in Your Laptop?Next time you are in the airport, don’t be surprised if some ICE agents, dressed as Viking pillagers, come running after you in the jet-way screaming “What’s in your laptop?” At least that’s a possibility hinted at by BIS Assistant Secretary Darryl Jackson’s remarks to the ACI Conference on International Technology Transfer last Saturday.

In noting the means which are used by foreign governments to obtain controlled technology, Assistant Secretary Jackson cited “theft or other exploitation of laptops, PDAs and other data storage devices carried abroad by U.S. business persons, scientists and engineers.” Accordingly, he suggested that compliance programs should now determine whether “employees traveling overseas have controlled technology on their laptops or PDAs.”

Of course, the EAR, properly read, may currently prohibit employees from traveling outside the United States with laptops containing technical data relating to EAR-controlled dual use technology, depending on the technology and the country. License Exception TMP which allows temporary exports of “tools of the trade” such as laptops permits the temporary export of controlled software but not technical data. Proposals have been suggested to include technical data in License Exception TMP, but they so far have not been adopted by BIS. (Temporary export of laptops by U.S. citizens with technical data controlled by ITAR is permitted under most circumstances by ITAR § 125.4(b)(9) as long as the data is solely for the use of the departing U.S. citizen).

I am probably not stepping out on a limb by saying that dual-use technical data is probably routinely exported by U.S. employees traveling overseas with such data on their laptops, either because they are unaware of the problem or because of a mistaken belief that License Exception TMP applies. Nor has this been a particular enforcement priority by BIS in the past. But if BIS intends to start requiring licenses for temporary exports of laptops for personal use by traveling U.S. employees, this seems to be misguided, particularly where it seems premised mostly on the remote possibility that these laptops will be stolen or compromised. This concern is more properly addressed by enforcing the provision of License Exception TMP that requires the laptop to remain under the “effective control” of the exporter or the exporter’s employee.

Permalink Comments (3)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)