Archive for the ‘Cuba Sanctions’ Category


Mar

9

Some Things Change; Some Things Don’t


Posted by at 9:14 pm on March 9, 2010
Category: Cuba SanctionsIran SanctionsSudanSyriaTechnology Exports

Twitter Keeps Iran AfloatHere’s what has changed at OFAC. Yesterday OFAC announced a general license for Iran and Sudan that would permit export of

certain services and software incident to the exchange of personal communications over the Internet, such as instant messaging, chat and email, social networking, sharing of photos and movies, web browsing, and blogging.

To be eligible the services must be offered free of charge and any software must be EAR99, not subject to the EAR, or mass market software classified under ECCN 5D992. Also, the exporter must not have any reason to believe that the services or software is destined to be used by the government of Sudan or Iran. A similar license was announced for Cuba but it only covered services since BIS controls exports of software to Cuba. Any bets on how long it will take for BIS to act to permit these software exports to Cuba? BIS action will also be necessary for similar exports to Syria.

And here is what hasn’t changed at OFAC. Today OFAC announced that it spent untold tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars to fine some poor schlub $575 for buying Cuban cigars over the Internet. I have to assume that this single cigar purchase will provide funds to the current Cuban government that will keep it in power for about five minutes longer than otherwise would have been the case thereby justifying all the government expense involved in imposing the fine.

Permalink Comments (5)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2010 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Dec

24

How the OFAC Stole Christmas


Posted by at 8:18 am on December 24, 2009
Category: Cuba SanctionsOFAC

Santa Flanked by F-16

A spokesman for the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) told Export Law Blog this morning that discussions between OFAC and the North Pole over Santa Claus’s Christmas Eve itinerary had broken down and were not expected to be resumed before Santa’s scheduled departure on December 24 at 10 pm EST.

The dispute arose from a dilemma that the U.S. sanctions against Cuba posed for Santa’s planned delivery of toys to children in Cuba. If Santa delivers toys for U.S. children first, there will be toys destined for Cuba in the sleigh in violation of 31 C.F.R. § 515.207(b). That rule prohibits Santa’s sleigh from entering the United States with “goods in which Cuba or a Cuban national has an interest.” On the other hand, if Santa delivers the toys to Cuban children first, then 31 C.F.R. § 515.207(a) prohibits the sleigh from entering the United States and “unloading freight for a period of 180 days from the date the vessel departed from a port or place in Cuba.”

A press release from the North Pole announced that the OFAC rules left Santa no choice but to bypass the children of the United States this Christmas. A spokesman from OFAC warned that if Santa attempted to overfly the United States, his sleigh would be forced to land and his cargo seized. He continued:

We know that the outcome is harsh, but we cannot allow Fidel Castro’s regime to continue to be propped up by Santa’s annual delivery of valuable Christmas toys to Cuban children.

Congressional leaders did not return our calls.


This post is an annual Christmas Eve tradition and appeared previously in 2007 and 2008 in slightly altered form. Export Law Blog would like to take the opportunity of this post to extend its best holiday wishes to all of its readers. Posting will be light between now and the end of the holidays due as much to the holidays as to a heartless clerk at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals who established a briefing schedule that requires me to file a brief on December 30.

Permalink Comments (3)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2009 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Nov

18

Wednesday Export Law Grab Bag


Posted by at 8:38 pm on November 18, 2009
Category: Cuba SanctionsIran Sanctions

Grab BagNo big news today, so it’s time for another Export Law Blog grab bag:

  • Failed state Solomon Islands wanted Iran to pay for transportation of Solomon Islands students to Cuba to attend medical school. Australia-based ANZ Bank refused to transfer $100,000 from Iran to pay for the transportation. The Solomon Islands High Commissioner to Australia complained that the banks actions weren’t based on international sanctions. The bank responded that it simply doesn’t engage in financial transactions involving Iran or Cuba. Presumably ANZ doesn’t want to cough up another $5.75 million fine to OFAC. Sometimes OFAC can successfully use fear as a means of asserting extraterritorial jurisdiction
  • Looks like that Iranian communications satellite that’s been kicking around for a while is going to remain earthbound for the forseeable future. The Russians sat on the satellite since 2005, leading the Iranians to claim that Italy would be launching it “soon.” Carlo Gavazzi Space said today that an Italian launch of the satellite wasn’t likely to happen since there were no launch platforms in Italy, that the satellite is currently in Italy and that no export license had been requested or would be requested for the satellite to be exported to another country for launch.
  • The Miami Herald published a bipartisan letter on Tuesday from Republican Richard Lugar and Democrat Howard Berman urging an end to the U.S. ban on travel to Cuba, noting that Cuba was the only country in the world to which Americans couldn’t travel and that the ban had prevented contact between “Cubans and ordinary Americans, who serve as ambassadors for the democratic values we hold dear.” The ink on the Miami Herald letter was hardly dry before José R. Cárdenas at Foreign Policy shot back, arguing that there was no reason to end the hugely successful travel ban and taking a swipe at ordinary Americans, who he claimed wouldn’t be ambassadors for democratic values but just a few more drunks on the beaches in Cuba.
Permalink Comments (2)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2009 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Oct

20

Menos Telefonos Para Mas Personas


Posted by at 7:56 pm on October 20, 2009
Category: Cuba Sanctions

mas_telefonos

Recent rule changes adopted in April and designed to remove certain sanctions imposed on telecommunications to Cuba had been met with complete silence by the Cuban government. Until last weekend, that is.

According to a story in GlobalPost.com, the director of international operations for the Cuban telephone monopoly, rebuffed the White House’s overtures with a “thanks, but no thanks.” Well, more accurately, leave out the “thanks.” The response was pretty much limited to “no.”

[D]uring an official government newscast Saturday, ETECSA international operations director Vivian Iglesias said there were two major obstacles to such a partnership: some $160 million in frozen funds that the U.S. government seized from ETECSA in 2000, and trade restrictions imposed by the 1992 Cuban Democracy Act, which forces Cuba to pay U.S. companies through third countries, incurring additional transaction fees.

“It may seem like the Obama administration has expanded communication possibilities,” said Iglesias. “But we know that unless restrictions like the (Cuban Democracy Act) and others that have been tightened since 1992 don’t change, there can’t be any normal communication.”

This appears to represent significant backtracking by Cuba on how to deal with the blocked funds. The blocked funds, which date back to 1966, represent funds owed by U.S. telecom carriers to Cuba for local carriage of calls originating in the United States. After the U.S. permitted payment of these local carriage charges to Cuba on a going-forward, but not retroactive, basis, Cuba attempted to recover the blocked funds with a 10 percent tax on calls to Cuba from the United States, even when routed through a foreign telecom company. Until the April regulations, U.S. authorities had refused to permit payment of this 10 percent tax, which ultimately led to Cuba’s suspension of direct telephone service between the United States and Cuba.

Now instead of seeking to recoup the funds incrementally through the tax, Cuba appears to want the U.S. to unblock the funds immediately. The problem here is that some of the blocked funds were released to pay judgments against the Cuban government obtained by the U.S. survivors of a Cessna flown by an American anti-Castro group into Cuban airspace and shot down by Cuba in 1996. Now that payment of the recoupment tax is permitted, the only reason that Cuba has moved the goal posts would appear to be that it’s not particularly interested in permitting direct calls from the U.S. to Cuba in any event.

Permalink Comments Off on Menos Telefonos Para Mas Personas

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2009 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Oct

6

N.J. Pol Nixes N.Y. Philharmonic Gig in Cuba


Posted by at 7:32 pm on October 6, 2009
Category: Cuba SanctionsOFAC

Empty StageLast week the New York Philharmonic announced that it had been forced to cancel its planned concert in Cuba at the end of October. Although the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) granted licenses to let the instrumentalists travel to Cuba, it declined to permit the orchestra’s patrons who were footing the bill for the trip to tag along.

This decision seems at odds with current initiatives by the White House to ease travel restrictions to Cuba. It now appears that the outcome was the handiwork of New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez, who threatened to vote against health reform if a single note of Gershwin was heard in a Havana concert hall. Menendez was reportedly infuriated by the recent success of a concert by a Colombian pop-star in Cuba, and didn’t want such a horrifying event to recur if the New York orchestra traveled to the island. Apparently for every note of Beethoven that a Cuban hears, Raúl Castro gets another week in office and Fidel draws another thousand breaths.

Permalink Comments (4)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2009 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)