Archive for the ‘Criminal Penalties’ Category


Sep

7

New Export Charges Filed Against Sixing Liu


Posted by at 8:15 pm on September 7, 2011
Category: Criminal PenaltiesDDTC

Chinese FlagThe Department of Justice announced today an expanded indictment of Sixing “Steve” Liu on additional charges that he violated the Arms Export Control Act through the unauthorized transfer of technical data relating to defense navigation systems. A previous indictment in April included one export count and two counts of making false statements to government agents. The new indictment covers eight counts of illegal exports, one count of transporting stolen goods, and two counts of false statements.

The charges arise from a secondary inspection of Liu by Customs and Border Patrol Protection agents at Newark Airport on November 29, 2010, as Liu was returning from the People’s Republic of China. Although Liu allegedly told agents he had been visiting family in China, inspection of his luggage revealed conference badges and other evidence that he had attended a technical conference in China during that trip. The inspection also revealed that his computer had various documents relating to defense navigation systems from the company where Liu worked as an engineer.

There is no evidence that Liu actually disclosed any of these documents during his trip to China. However, simply carrying the documents into China, even if they weren’t disclosed to anyone there, is considered an export of those documents.

The criminal complaint that preceded the April indictment hilariously mangles the definition of “export” in the International Traffic in Arms Regulations in order to make the case that Liu exported the technical data at issue:

The regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act, known as the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (hereinafter, “ITAR”) define exporting to include, among other things: “[s]ending or taking a defense article out of the United States in any manner . . . by a person whose personal knowledge includes technical data.”

Sharp-eyed readers and fellow ITARnauts will no doubt notice the odd omission of “except” where the ellipses appear. Here’s how that section actually reads in full with the deleted words emphasized:

Export means: (1) Sending or taking a defense article out of the United States in any manner, except by mere travel outside of the United States by a person whose personal knowledge includes technical data.

Oops. What is supposed to be a sensible exception to the definition of “export” is turned into a new requirement by this misquotation.

Permalink Comments (5)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2011 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Aug

25

Arms Dealer Viktor Bout Wins Pretrial Victory Against Government.


Posted by at 7:48 pm on August 25, 2011
Category: Criminal Penalties

Only known photo of Viktor BoutNotorious Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout is on trial in Manhattan for allegedly conspiring to sell weapons to DEA agents posing as members of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, who claimed they intended to use the weapons against American pilots flying over Columbia to monitor drug activity. Yesterday the judge in that case ruled that statements Bout made to the DEA agents while he was in custody in Thailand, where he was initially arrested for the charges relating to the FARC sting, were inadmissible.

The judge concluded that, contrary to testimony, the agents had been aware of the Thai police’s refusal after Mr. Bout’s arrest to grant him access to legal counsel and to a representative of the Russian embassy. She also found that the agents’ contention that they would have no further access to him after their initial meeting was “false” and that they were untruthful when they denied insinuating they could take Mr. Bout to the United States immediately if he “cooperated” and waived extradition.

Instead, Judge Scheindlin credited the defense team’s assertion that the agents had threatened Mr. Bout, insinuating that he would face “disease, hunger, heat and rape” in Thai jails, where he would face abandonment if he failed to cooperate with the American agents.

Of course, not everything has been so rosy for Mr. Bout in his trial. Last week the same district court judge ruled that the prosecution could introduce evidence of sanctions that were imposed on Mr. Bout by the US and UN for his arms dealing activities although the government could not introduce evidence relating to why the sanctions were imposed. Bout’s lawyer claimed that such evidence was prejudicial and continues to maintain that Mr. Bout has never engaged in arms dealing or arms brokering. As they say, that’s his story and he’s sticking to it.

For those interested in why sanctions were imposed on Mr. Bout, details can be found in this previous post on Export Law Blog

Permalink Comments (1)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2011 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Jul

27

Guilty Plea Expected To Be Entered in eBay Drone Sting Case


Posted by at 9:41 pm on July 27, 2011
Category: Criminal Penalties

Robot Attack!This blog reported in detail back in March of this year on the prosecution of Henderson Chua, a Philippine citizen, arising from his importation of military drone parts into the United States. Based on information in the indictment, it seemed to me that there were significant holes in the government’s case. Even so, and as is often the case, it is reported that Chua is expected to plead guilty tomorrow to the government’s charges.

As I noted in the original post, after Mr. Chua listed the parts on eBay, a government sting was conducted with U.S. agents pretending to be buyers for the parts. Initially, the government agents seemed to think, incorrectly, that the permanent import of the parts was illegal, which would not be the case because they were not listed on the United States Munitions Import List So the agents changed the deal and told Chua that the parts were for re-export to Russia, which would have required a license both for the temporary import into the United States and for the permanent export to Russia. Chua told them that he couldn’t sell them the items for export from the United States and had the agents sign an agreement not to export the items. From my point of view, the prosecution was going to have a hard time establishing that Chua had requisite criminal intent.

The anticipated guilty plea was reported on by DC political blog TPM Muckracker, which contained this howler about the case:

The Raven is listed on the U.S. munitions list as a defensive item, and U.S. law forbids people from buying and selling defense equipment without permission from the government.

Uh, no. U.S. law only forbids export of such equipment without permission. I can buy all the Category VIII(h) military aircraft parts I want without a license as long as they stay here in the United States. I guess it’s easier for a reporter simply to make things up than to, say, fire up Google in their web browser or, imagine this, to call an expert.

Permalink Comments Off on Guilty Plea Expected To Be Entered in eBay Drone Sting Case

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2011 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Jul

18

New Bio Links Pretty Woman Producer and Export Violations


Posted by at 6:20 pm on July 18, 2011
Category: Criminal Penalties

Confidential Book CoverA new bio of Arnon Milchan — who, among other things, produced the movie “Pretty Woman” — alleges that he had a secret life as a spy and links him to an 1980s criminal export case. The book, Confidential: The Life of Secret Agent Turned Hollywood Tycoon – Arnon Milchan, by Meir Doron and Joseph Gelman, is a subject of a report today in Haaretz, which gives the details.

According to the Haaretz story, Milchan was recruited by Shimon Peres to work for the Israeli spy agency LAKAM which was tasked with making purchases for Israel’s nuclear program

For years, Milchan operated in secret, yet in the mid-1980’s U.S. customs uncovered an attempt to smuggle “switches” –- equipment that can be used both for medical purposes and for nuclear weapons manufacture -– by the California-based Milco company, owned by Milchan. The company’s CEO, Richard Kelly Smyth, was arrested and released on bail. He fled the country soon after.

Smyth was declared a fugitive, and according to some reports found refuge in Israel. In 2001 he was captured in Spain and was brought back to the U.S., where he stood trial and was incarcerated. The FBI began an investigation into Milchan’s affairs, yet he has never been charged.

According to the book, right after the “switches” fiasco Milchan called his friend Peres, then prime minister, and asked for his help in dealing with the Ronald Reagan administration. Milchan is quoted in the book as saying he never received money for his services, and that everything he did was for the state of Israel.

Laura Rozen, whose post alerted me to the story, notes that the switches were krytrons, which are used to trigger spark gap switches to detonate nuclear devices. Laura also notes that Richard Kelly Smyth was not incarcerated upon his conviction but received parole because of his old age.

Permalink Comments Off on New Bio Links Pretty Woman Producer and Export Violations

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2011 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)

Jul

13

Judge Denies Request to Hold Export Defendant Without Bond


Posted by at 8:13 pm on July 13, 2011
Category: Criminal PenaltiesEntity List

Chasma Nuclear Power PlantThe story of the unlicensed export of epoxy paint by PPG to the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission carries on. This blog reported on the $500,000 fine imposed on the regional sales manager involved. The epoxy was shipped to fulfill a contract between a Chinese subsidiary of PPG and another Chinese company engaged to work on the construction of the Chasma nuclear power plant for PAEC. Because PAEC is on the Bureau of Industry and Security’s Entity List, the export required a license from BIS.

Xu Wang, a U.S. woman who ran the Chinese subsidiary, was arrested last month. During a hearing yesterday, the government argued without success that she should be held without bail. According to this AP report on the hearing, the judge questioned the prosecution’s assertion that the case had serious national security ramifications.

“This is not latex paint,” said assistant U.S. Attorney G. Michael Harvey. “This is a very sophisticated paint, which has been tested and certified for use inside the containment facility of a nuclear reactor.”

That may well be the case, but if this paint indeed had such strategic implications, one has to wonder why the BIS stated, as it did in the case involving the sales manager, that the item was classified as EAR99.

A hearing was to be held today to determine the conditions of Mrs. Wang’s release.

Permalink Comments (1)

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © 2011 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)