Aug

17

More Export Controls Because, Er, Killer Robots


Posted by at 6:07 pm on August 17, 2015
Category: General

Trumpet-Playing Robot by Angela N. [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Flickr https://flic.kr/p/4s2UYZ [cropped]

Wall Street Journal tech writer Christopher Mims has a really bad idea today: impose U.S. “export controls on commercial robotics and drone technology.” Mr. Mims, who was trained as a neuroscientist, can, I suppose, be forgiven for not knowing much about export controls, but that still does not fully excuse such a ridiculous idea.

First, let’s start with his reason for imposing these export controls, which appears to have had its genesis in Mims spending too much time watching old Terminator flicks.

It’s inevitable, say the experts I talked to, that nonstate actors and rogue states will create killer robots once the underpinnings of this [commercial robotics and drone] technology become cheap and accessible, thanks to its commercial use.

Yes, but terrorists and rogue states can use mobile phones to detonate bombs remotely as well, and no one is suggesting that the way to solve this problem is to prevent the export of mobile phones and mobile phone technology.

Second, and most importantly, the notion that export controls would solve this problem is based on Mims’s notion that all technology of any value comes from the United States. If other countries have such technology, U.S. export controls won’t fix the problem and will simply disadvantage U.S. companies. On this point, Mims should read his own newspaper. The Wall Street Journal, only a few months back, noted that the biggest seller of commercial drones, the ones that Mims fears will be loaded with bombs by terrorists, is SZ DJI Technology Co., located in … are you ready? … China.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2015 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


One Comment:


To be fair, both BIS and DDTC also seem to believe that “all technology of any value comes from the United States”. While I suppose that there may be political reasons for DDTC to withhold licenses for defense articles (including technical data) of US-origin despite foreign availability, BIS all but ignores the foreign availability provisions of the long dead Export Administration Act, despite their supposed inclusions in the routine continuation of the emergency under IEEPA under the successive executive orders.

I just that just goes to show that all zombies, including zombie legislation like the EAA, are missing something they possessed while they were alive.

Comment by Mike Deal on August 19th, 2015 @ 8:41 am