Nov

16

Nepal Peace Accord Complicates U.S. Exports to Nepal


Posted by at 8:34 am on November 16, 2006
Category: OFAC

NepalWhat happens when a rebel group on the OFAC SDN list lays down its arms, renounces terrorism and joins a government friendly to the United States? If you said they would be removed from the list, you would be wrong. If you said it would result in the U.S. requiring U.S. companies to obtain licenses to deal with the government, you might be right.

In 2003 the Communist Party of Nepal, generally referred to simply as the Maoists, was added to the SDN list. Last week the Maoist rebels reached a peace accord with the government of Nepal pursuant to which they would lock up their weapons and then join an interim coalition government. The United States, skeptical that the Maoists will keep their promise to end violence, has refused to remove the Maoists from the SDN list.

If the Maoists remain on the list, the effect of their joining the government may mean that certain transactions with the government of Nepal may, in effect, be transactions benefiting the SDN-listed Maoists and might, accordingly, require a license. As a result, NGOs in Nepal may now need to obtain OFAC licenses to continue operations in Nepal after implementation of the peace accords. Exports from the U.S. to the government of Nepal or to companies owned by it may be subject to the same restrictions.

A “highly-placed” source told the Kathmandu Post that the U.S. Embassy had requested that OFAC grant licenses to permit NGOs to continue to operate in Nepal when the Maoists join the coalition government on December 1. That source indicated that the grant of the licenses was almost certain.

A similar situation was posed when Hamas, also on the SDN list, became the majority party of the Palestinian Legislative Council of the Palestinian Authority after the January 2006 elections. As a result, members of Hamas hold high-level positions of authority in the government, including the post of Prime Minister. Accordingly, OFAC determined that transactions with the Palestinian Authority would require OFAC licenses and issued a series of six general licenses to permit certain transactions with the Palestinian Authority. These general licenses include a general license permitting U.S. citizens to act as employees of the U.N. in the West Bank and Gaza and another general license permitting in-kind donations of medicine, medical services and medical devices.

Whether or not the Maoist participation in the Nepal government will be analogous to the Hamas situation with the Palestinian Authority is difficult to determine at this time since the final details of the accord between the Maoists and Nepal are unknown. Accordingly, any exporter dealing with the government of Nepal or its state-owned enterprises should exercise caution until the situation becomes clear — both as to the level of the Maoist’s participation in the coalition government and as to OFAC’s response to such participation.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2006 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


2 Comments:


[…] The U.S. Embassy in Nepal announced today that OFAC has granted a license to the U.S. Mission in Nepal and to the U.S. Agency for International Development to continue to provide assistance to the Government of Nepal notwithstanding the participation of the Communist Party of Nepal (usually referred to simply as the Maoists) in the interim government of Nepal. As we noted in an earlier post, the Maoists were added to the SDN list in 2003. Even though the Government of Nepal has reached a peace accord with the Maoists and included them in the interim government, the United States has not removed them from the SDN list. This means that provision of goods, services or financial assistance to the Government of Nepal or its agencies violates OFAC’s anti-terrorism sanctions regulations. […]

Comment by ExportLawBlog » From Here to Kathmandu on February 7th, 2007 @ 6:10 pm

[…] On a broader note, these “secret sanctions” such as those imposed on the PA, and more recently on Nepal, are a compliance headache of the first order. A compliance officer might look at the list of sanctioned countries and the SDN list and never conclude that the Palestinian Authority or the Nepalese Government were sanctioned unless they happened to know, as well, that SDNs had become part of the PA and the Nepalese Government. Granted the sanctions aren’t completely secret because in both cases there were General Licenses ultimately issued which indirectly attest to the difficulties of dealing with the PA and Nepal. Still, here’s a question for export compliance officers: have the Government of Nepal and the Palestinian Authority ever been mentioned in your OFAC compliance programs? Permalink No Comments […]

Comment by ExportLawBlog » OFAC Issues General License for Transactions with Palestinian Authority on June 20th, 2007 @ 9:20 pm