Nov

25

BIS Proposes Ending De Minimis Exception for Avionics


Posted by at 9:34 pm on November 25, 2008
Category: General

A380 cockpit
ABOVE:A380 Cockpit

The Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) has asked for comment on a proposal to eliminate the de minimis rule, in certain instances, with respect to products classified under Category 7A of the Commerce Control List and controlled for missile technology (“MT”) reasons. The de minimis rule permits re-exports of foreign manufactured goods containing U.S. origin components when those components constitute only de minimis content, as defined by the rule, of the final product.

The concern which has prompted the proposed limitation is that the avionics and navigational items controlled by Category 7A for MT reasons might be diverted by foreign governments and be used for missile proliferation. The proposed rule excepts U.S.-origin components incorporated into “standard equipment in FAA (or national equivalent) certified civilian transport aircraft.” The reason for this exception is that in that case there is less likelihood of diversion because, in large part, it seems unlikely that foreign companies or governments would buy civilian aircraft simply to strip out the navigation and avionics in order to incorporate such items into a national missile program. In the case of aircraft components, however, the likelihood of diversion into missile programs is thought to be higher.

The proposed exception is not clearly explained by BIS, but I think it would work like this. If a U.S.-origin Category 7A item controlled for MT reasons is exported to be incorporated in an aircraft component, that component can’t then be re-exported to a third country even if it is to incorporated as standard equipment in an FAA-certified aircraft. However, if the U.S.-origin component is incorporated into the aircraft component and that component is incorporated as standard equipment in an FAA-certified civilian aircraft in the same country, then the de minimis rule would apply to exports of the aircraft.

Comments are requested on what impact this would have on, among other things, the decision by foreign manufacturers to use U.S. components and estimates of U.S. jobs that might be affected by the rule. The deadline for comments, which can be filed by email at [email protected], is January 20, 2009.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2008 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


2 Comments:


I do not dispute the philosphy behind this BIS proposed ruling to protect our Country. But this issue brings to mind a comment from one exporter trying to obtain a license from DDTC for spare parts for C130’s and he lack success (nothing new). Other proponents (from Europe) for the bid to the foreign government, he said, were proudly offering ITAR FREE spare parts…I was speechless and the exporter did not offer to mention names.

I need to trademark this term before anybody does it.

Comment by Jairo on November 26th, 2008 @ 8:47 am

With respect, this is nonsense. Most of these technologies are well known throughout the world, have been described in patent claims and specifications (which means they’re publicly available), and have legitimate applications outside of missile or UAVZ guidance – indeed , their common embodiment is normally outside the world of avionics and are more likely centered inindustrial applications.

At best, this announcement is evidence of how incompetent the current administration, or – more likely – how much they’ve sold out to the Chinese Communist Party.

Comment by Mike Deal on November 27th, 2008 @ 4:19 pm