Sep

29

Shrimp Exporter Peeled, De-veined and Fried


Posted by at 12:40 pm on September 29, 2006
Category: Criminal Penalties

ShrimpToday is Friday, and we have shrimp on the menu.

Last Monday Pacific Shrimp Company pleaded guilty to various charges arising from its exports of shrimp to Mexico. The company pleaded guilty to two counts of falsifying a government document, which is a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3). In order to obtain NAFTA’s tariff-free treatment from Mexico, the company falsely certified that the shrimp originated from the United States even though it had been purchased from India and was being re-exported to Mexico. Specifically, the company admitted that it falsified the Department of Commerce’s NAFTA Certificate of Origin. (In addition to the Certificate of Origin, the company also admitted that it falsified health and inspection certificates related to the exports.)

What is significant here for exporters is that even though Mexico was injured by the exporter’s actions, the exporter was still prosecuted in the United States. Further, the U.S. prosecution would not curtail any remedies that Mexico might have against the exporter for violation of Mexican law.

Pacific Shrimp also pleaded guilty to two counts of unlawful exports of wildlife in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 3372(a)(2)(A), which prohibits exports of fish, shellfish or wildlife in violation of any state or foreign law. Presumably this statute was violated because the export of the shrimp to Mexico with a false certificate of origin violated Mexican law.

The Company, as part of a plea deal, agreed to a fine of $120,000 and five years probation.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2006 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


One Comment:


[…] False labelling of exported goods can land exporters in a world of trouble and sometimes in places they don’t expect. We previously posted on a shrimp exporter prosecuted in the United States for misrepresentations made to Mexican authorities. Today we have a new development in the case of a Vietnamese exporter indicted in Florida for mislabeling exports from Vietnam to the United States. […]

Comment by ExportLawBlog » Catfish Row on October 11th, 2006 @ 2:06 pm