Jun

14

DDTC Still Can’t Find Its Way With Inertial Navigational Chips


Posted by at 9:31 pm on June 14, 2007
Category: BISDDTCITAR Creep

QRS-11 Inertial Navigational ChipThe QRS-11 navigational chip, perhaps the poster child for the so-called ITAR creep phenomenon, still bedevils the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. Today, the DDTC issued a final rule amending the rule excluding the QRS-11 chip from the United States Munitions List. The rule attempts to address wider integration of the chip in civil aircraft but still doesn’t quite solve the problem.

First, a little background is in order. As you may recall, the integration of the QRS-11 chip into Boeing aircraft sold to China led to a $15 million fine being imposed on Boeing when it failed to get DDTC export licenses for these aircraft. Recognizing the absurdity of requiring a license because of a $2,000 part in a commercial aircraft costing $100 million or more, DDTC added a Note to category VIII of the ITAR to exempt the QRS-11 chip and other quartz rate sensor chips when (a) it was integrated into the standby navigational system of a commercial aircraft and (b) the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) determined that the chip was subject to its own licensing jurisdiction.

Shortly thereafter BIS amended the EAR to include ECCN 7A994 which covers the QRS-11 chip (but not other quartz rate sensors) when integrated into a commercial standby instrument system of a civil aircraft. Under ECCN 7A994, the QRS-11 chip requires a BIS license for exports to all destinations except for Canada.

Traditionally inertial navigational chips and systems had been used in standby systems to the GPS used in the primary system. A standby or backup system supplies navigational information when the primary GPS is unable to get a lock on the GPS satellites and is unable to provide location information. The QRS-11 chip, however, is increasingly being integrated into primary navigational systems of civil aircraft and thus no longer subject, in those instances, to the exemption adopted by DDTC.

The new rule reflects this change and exempts the QRS-11 chip and other quartz rate sensors integrated into a primary instrument system of a commercial aircraft. The amended rule also requires a notification from BIS that the chip when integrated into a primary system is subject to BIS jurisdiction. And that’s the rub. BIS has not yet amended its rules to include in ECCN 7A994 chips integrated into primary instrument systems. Accordingly, notwithstanding DDTC’s amendment, no chip integrated into a primary system will be subject to the DDTC exemption. And there’s no indication when BIS will get around to amending its rules to add chips in primary instrument systems.

It should probably come as no surprise that as the price of quartz rate sensor chips drops, they are also being integrated into the navigational and stabilization systems of automobiles. So you may soon or already be driving an export-controlled car. As the pace of ITAR creep accelerates we may have to call it something else — ITAR surge, perhaps.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


8 Comments:


Once again, DDTC acts as though it is a law unto itself. In this case it ignores Sec. 17(c)and (m) of the EAA, which supposedly are continued in force by Executive Order. Or is what the Administration telling us is that, in fact, the sections of the EAA that the administration finds inconvenient will be ignored.

Comment by Mike Deal on June 15th, 2007 @ 1:05 pm

Inertial Nav systems or more specifically the inertial measurement units in them are going to have to be dealt with. It isn’t just the QSR-11 that is shrinking. Survey grade systems are backpack portable now. And most manufacturers aren’t as clear as on the export controls on this technology.

“The fastest way to go to jail (without passing go) will be to flaunt the export controls associated with this technology.”

Comment by JKB on June 16th, 2007 @ 7:05 pm

Okay, the link html didn’t work. Looks like I missed a “>”. The company is Zupt. Looks like the link is there.

Comment by JKB on June 16th, 2007 @ 7:45 pm

Love the site Mr. Burns. Just wanted to draw your attention to one of the comments posted here is preventing RSS downloads. Checked via RSS validators. Keep up the great posts!

Comment by Chris Dressler on June 18th, 2007 @ 8:17 pm

Thanks, Chris. I’ll check and see what’s going on. Any idea of which comments?

Comment by Clif Burns on June 18th, 2007 @ 8:20 pm

Has to do with the comments field in the QRS-11 story. Not real familiar with RSS. Says line 35. Something about RSS should read Rss???

Comment by Chris Dressler on June 18th, 2007 @ 8:26 pm

Yep, I found it. It’s an error in WordPress. I fixed that and the feed validates now. I also think I found another problem that may have interfered with the feed. One of the comments was missing a close anchor tag which could also cause things to go awry. Let me know if this fixes it. Thanks for the heads up.

Comment by Clif Burns on June 18th, 2007 @ 8:34 pm

Sorry Clif. Maybe it is my program but it worked on Friday. Internet connections to RSS feed work fine but I keep getting “could not locate this feed online” on my mobile. All other subscribed feeds work fine????

Comment by Chris Dressler on June 18th, 2007 @ 8:57 pm