May

21

Guess Who Is Doing Business in Iran?


Posted by at 6:18 pm on May 21, 2012
Category: Iran Sanctions

PeugeotLast Thursday, May 17, Ileana Ross-Lehtinen, who never saw a sanction she didn’t like, had her committee, the House Foreign Relations Committee, hold a hearing on sanctions in Iran. The Committee heard testimony from, among other witnesses, former Bush administration official, Mark Wallace, who now runs a lobbying group called United Against Nuclear Iran which, although it would prefer simply bombing Iran, will settle for sanctions as the next best thing.

UANI’s latest campaign is to pressure automobile companies to stop doing business in Iran. (If nuclear scientists can’t drive to work, that will apparently cripple Iran’s nuclear ambitions.) Wallace’s testimony before the Committee, however, contained this interesting nugget:

Despite its extensive business in Iran, Peugeot has partnered with American automaker General Motors, a company partly owned by the U.S. Treasury.

In fact, in March, General Motors bought 7 percent of Peugeot. The Treasury Department, which administers U.S. sanctions against Iran, owns about 25 percent of GM. And now it indirectly owns a piece of Peugeot which ships complete knock-down (CKD) kits to Khodro in Iran. Khodro then assembles and sells the Peugeots in Iran. Apparently, the export of CKD kits by Peugeot to Khodro in Iran has been stopped for the moment. Peugeot cites the risky financial situation in Iran and not the GM investment as the reason it temporarily stopped shipping CKD kits to Iran.

As part of its campaign against automakers, UANI is pushing an acronym-errific piece of legislation it calls the DRIVE act. That stands for the Debarment and Restrictions for Iranian-related Vehicle Enterprises Act and would require automakers to certify that they are not doing any business in Iran to be eligible for government contracts or financial assistance. (I suppose calling it the Car Restrictions Against Persians Act was out of the question.)

Before you accuse me of being soft on Iran, I do support smart sanctions which target goods that are useful for nuclear proliferation and groups in Iran involved in nuclear proliferation. However, keeping Peugeots out of Iran won’t accomplish much other than, perhaps, to bankrupt Iranian car repair garages that all do gangbuster business fixing broken-down Peugeots.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2012 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


3 Comments:


Hi Clif –

Not sure, but in the last paragraph, I think you meant to write “However, keeping Peugeots out of Iran (not France) won’t accomplish much…”

Comment by Stephane on May 22nd, 2012 @ 9:47 am

Funny how the gentlelady from Cuba, er, I mean Florida, likes to talk about every set of “job killing regulations” except her own. Of course, her support for sanctions on Iran are simply a quid pro quo for other special interest groups’ support for or at least tolerance of continuation of the export embargo of Cuba. She is delighted to let Cubans in Florida remit cash money to relatives in Cuba in exchange for nothing, but unwilling to let Americans export US-made products supporting US jobs even to third countries that might use them to make products that might get sold to Cuba.

Comment by Hillbilly on May 22nd, 2012 @ 1:00 pm