Feb

28

Whose Default Is It Anyway?


Posted by at 5:15 pm on February 28, 2007
Category: BISCriminal Penalties

In JailIn today’s Federal Register, the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) published a decision by an Administrative Law Judge finding William Kovacs in default in responding to a charging letter, fining him $66,000, and suspending his export privileges for five years. The decision resulted from a motion for default filed by BIS on January 11, 2007.

The facts relating to Mr. Kovacs are not particularly savory. Mr. Kovacs had applied for a BIS license to export an industrial furnace to the Beijing Research Institute of Materials and Technology. BIS denied the license on the ground that BRIMT was likely to use the furnace for the design, development, production or use of missiles. Undeterred Mr. Kovacs and BRIMT agreed that the furnace would be shipped to a “new” customer in China who would, in fact, be BRIMT under a different name. This was, as they say, just asking for it.

The ALJ opinion doesn’t, however, tell the full story as to why Mr. Kovacs might have been in default when BIS filed the Motion for Default on January 11, 2007. That may well have been because Mr. Kovacs was in jail serving a sentence imposed on October 5, 2006, for a criminal conviction arising from the export of the furnace to BRIMT. Granted Mr. Kovacs wasn’t in jail when the charging letter was sent by BIS on June 28, 2005, but that meant that BIS had plenty of time to bring the motion for default while Kovacs still had some opportunity to respond in person. There is also nothing in the decision to indicate that BIS provided a copy of the motion to Mr. Kovacs at his prison address even though BIS certainly did know where to find him.

Kovacs doesn’t seem a particularly sympathetic defendant, but that is still not a reason for BIS not to play fair with him.

Permalink

Bookmark and Share

Copyright © 2007 Clif Burns. All Rights Reserved.
(No republication, syndication or use permitted without my consent.)


2 Comments:


Though it’s hardly my field of law, it seems to me that incarceration might just be a mitigating factor.

Comment by mous, anony on March 1st, 2007 @ 11:43 am

[…] In an earlier post, we took the Bureau of Industry and Security (”BIS”) to task for filing a default motion against William Kovacs to deny his export privileges even though he was in jail for his export violation and his ability to respond to BIS’s default motion would be, well, limited. We also felt pretty sure that BIS knew where he was, because BIS’s own reports on the case indicated that Kovacs had been incarcerated. […]

Comment by ExportLawBlog » Where in the World Is William Kovacs? on March 2nd, 2007 @ 12:32 pm