http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/77 Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/77/comment-page-1#comment-1644 ExportLawBlog » BIS Announces New Penalty Policies Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:00:50 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/77#comment-1644 [...] We have complained before (see here for example) about BIS’s tendency to charge single transactions as multiple violations in order to increase penalties imposed upon those making voluntary disclosures. Assistant Secretary’s remarks suggest that BIS may be retreating from that policy. Permalink No Comments [...] [...] We have complained before (see here for example) about BIS’s tendency to charge single transactions as multiple violations in order to increase penalties imposed upon those making voluntary disclosures. Assistant Secretary’s remarks suggest that BIS may be retreating from that policy. Permalink No Comments [...]

]]> http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/77/comment-page-1#comment-250 Slinger Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:25:04 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/77#comment-250 I have heard that the resolved vs. filed discrepancy is even worse that you reported. According to a number of lawyers, I understand that those that are filed but not resolved in the same fiscal year are NOT even reported in the following fiscal years. Can you determine whether that is accurate? If so, that is very troubling. I have heard that the resolved vs. filed discrepancy is even worse that you reported. According to a number of lawyers, I understand that those that are filed but not resolved in the same fiscal year are NOT even reported in the following fiscal years. Can you determine whether that is accurate? If so, that is very troubling.

]]>