<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Brits Prosecuted in U.K. for Illegal Exports of Aircraft Parts to Iran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/495/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/495</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Yip</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/495/comment-page-1#comment-22346</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Yip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 01:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=495#comment-22346</guid>
		<description>&quot;...genuinely believed the parts were non-military&quot;

Anonymous:

Even if that is true (though I highly doubt it), they knew it was ultimately going to Iran.  Given the history of the company -- it wasn&#039;t the first violation (think 2005) -- I respectfully disagree with your belief.

Regards,
Kelly Yip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;genuinely believed the parts were non-military&#8221;</p>
<p>Anonymous:</p>
<p>Even if that is true (though I highly doubt it), they knew it was ultimately going to Iran.  Given the history of the company &#8212; it wasn&#8217;t the first violation (think 2005) &#8212; I respectfully disagree with your belief.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Kelly Yip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/495/comment-page-1#comment-22344</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=495#comment-22344</guid>
		<description>I happen to know one of the men involved and I am 100% convinced that they genuinely believed the parts were non-military.

The company involved makes too much money to risk prosecution over what - to them - was a tiny deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to know one of the men involved and I am 100% convinced that they genuinely believed the parts were non-military.</p>
<p>The company involved makes too much money to risk prosecution over what &#8211; to them &#8211; was a tiny deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

