<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada Prosecutes Export Violation; Sun Sets in East</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491/comment-page-1#comment-22325</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=491#comment-22325</guid>
		<description>Clif,

You have quoted three statements by George Webb.  Here is another one from the same news story.   

Iran currently has &quot;all of the required materials&quot; to produce a nuclear weapon, Webb said. &quot;I don&#039;t personally believe they&#039;re there yet, but they are very, very, very close.&quot;

It was the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that contacted the Canada Border Services Agency.    There have been many changes in the US over the past few months.  Most of  John McCains &quot;Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” gang are looking for a job.  That is not the case here in Canada.   Have a closer look at what Mr Webb is saying.  Could this be true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clif,</p>
<p>You have quoted three statements by George Webb.  Here is another one from the same news story.   </p>
<p>Iran currently has &#8220;all of the required materials&#8221; to produce a nuclear weapon, Webb said. &#8220;I don&#8217;t personally believe they&#8217;re there yet, but they are very, very, very close.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that contacted the Canada Border Services Agency.    There have been many changes in the US over the past few months.  Most of  John McCains &#8220;Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” gang are looking for a job.  That is not the case here in Canada.   Have a closer look at what Mr Webb is saying.  Could this be true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491/comment-page-1#comment-22324</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=491#comment-22324</guid>
		<description>What are “isotope splitters”?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are “isotope splitters”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491/comment-page-1#comment-22315</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=491#comment-22315</guid>
		<description>Kelly,

Please cite specific passages from the 9-11 report that say the terrorists came through Canada? Citing the whole report seems like a quick way to dodge the fact that your original statement was wrong, which I believe (but am not sure) it is.

And here&#039;s a recent news report stating as much. Note the last line:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5g-NwYE5X587TOf1JRYGyugVdIYtg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelly,</p>
<p>Please cite specific passages from the 9-11 report that say the terrorists came through Canada? Citing the whole report seems like a quick way to dodge the fact that your original statement was wrong, which I believe (but am not sure) it is.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s a recent news report stating as much. Note the last line:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5g-NwYE5X587TOf1JRYGyugVdIYtg" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5g-NwYE5X587TOf1JRYGyugVdIYtg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Yip</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491/comment-page-1#comment-22306</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Yip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=491#comment-22306</guid>
		<description>Dear Joey:

With reference to your &quot;What did Canada have to do with the 9-11 terrorists?,&quot; please see the 9/11 Commission Report.  http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/fullreport.pdf 

Regards,
Kelly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Joey:</p>
<p>With reference to your &#8220;What did Canada have to do with the 9-11 terrorists?,&#8221; please see the 9/11 Commission Report.  <a href="http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/fullreport.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/fullreport.pdf</a> </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Kelly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491/comment-page-1#comment-22304</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=491#comment-22304</guid>
		<description>What did Canada have to do with the 9-11 terrorists? They all came into the United States legally from the Middle East, and we even trained them on how to fly airliners into our own buildings. Stupid, yes. Canada&#039;s fault, no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did Canada have to do with the 9-11 terrorists? They all came into the United States legally from the Middle East, and we even trained them on how to fly airliners into our own buildings. Stupid, yes. Canada&#8217;s fault, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491/comment-page-1#comment-22300</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=491#comment-22300</guid>
		<description>Gerry,

The post made quite clear that he was just charged, not convicted.  The point of the post, in any event, was not really about the defendant but about the rather diffident attitude of the Canadian government towards export enforcement.  Apparently, they can only charge somebody when somebody else hands them the evidence, all gift-wrapped and with a bow on top.   Otherwise when the seize dual use items useful in proliferation headed to Iran, they throw up their hands and say &quot;I wonder who might have sent that?&quot;

Also, your reference to the website&#039;s other uses for the transducers completely misses the point on controls on dual use items.  By definition, all dual use items can be used for other things and they are controlled for export even if the exporter intends them to be used for benign purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerry,</p>
<p>The post made quite clear that he was just charged, not convicted.  The point of the post, in any event, was not really about the defendant but about the rather diffident attitude of the Canadian government towards export enforcement.  Apparently, they can only charge somebody when somebody else hands them the evidence, all gift-wrapped and with a bow on top.   Otherwise when the seize dual use items useful in proliferation headed to Iran, they throw up their hands and say &#8220;I wonder who might have sent that?&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, your reference to the website&#8217;s other uses for the transducers completely misses the point on controls on dual use items.  By definition, all dual use items can be used for other things and they are controlled for export even if the exporter intends them to be used for benign purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Hawke</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491/comment-page-1#comment-22299</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Hawke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=491#comment-22299</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get ahead of yourself.  He has not been prosecuted for anything.  Remember the concept of guilty until proven otherwise.

Also, it&#039;s yet to be proven these pressure transducers were intended for nuclear production.  The Setra website says the uses &quot;include not only industrial, OEM, barometric, HVAC/R (Heating, Ventilating, Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration), environmental, test and measurement, food and pharmaceutical, but the agricultural, medical, and semi-conductor industries as well.&quot;

We should wait until this man has his day in court before we contribute to the Iranian hysteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get ahead of yourself.  He has not been prosecuted for anything.  Remember the concept of guilty until proven otherwise.</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s yet to be proven these pressure transducers were intended for nuclear production.  The Setra website says the uses &#8220;include not only industrial, OEM, barometric, HVAC/R (Heating, Ventilating, Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration), environmental, test and measurement, food and pharmaceutical, but the agricultural, medical, and semi-conductor industries as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>We should wait until this man has his day in court before we contribute to the Iranian hysteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Yip</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491/comment-page-1#comment-22297</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Yip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=491#comment-22297</guid>
		<description>Frankly, Canada has always been our weak link in every way imaginable.  i.e., 9/11 terrorists.

Regards,
Kelly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, Canada has always been our weak link in every way imaginable.  i.e., 9/11 terrorists.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Kelly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Q. Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491/comment-page-1#comment-22294</link>
		<dc:creator>John Q. Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=491#comment-22294</guid>
		<description>This is a big red flag for all of us who toil in the export control community.  We worry about transshipments of sensitive U.S. items from places like Dubai and Singapore, but now it sounds like our biggest trading partner&#039;s cluelessness is undermining U.S. export controls right under our noses.  And it&#039;s particularly problematic given that our exports to Canada are in most cases exempt from AES reporting.  Mr. Obama should have a neighborly (or neighbourly) chat with Mr. Harper about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a big red flag for all of us who toil in the export control community.  We worry about transshipments of sensitive U.S. items from places like Dubai and Singapore, but now it sounds like our biggest trading partner&#8217;s cluelessness is undermining U.S. export controls right under our noses.  And it&#8217;s particularly problematic given that our exports to Canada are in most cases exempt from AES reporting.  Mr. Obama should have a neighborly (or neighbourly) chat with Mr. Harper about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillbilly</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/491/comment-page-1#comment-22291</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillbilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=491#comment-22291</guid>
		<description>The horse looks smarter than the Mountie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The horse looks smarter than the Mountie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

