<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thai Court Refuses U.S. Extradition Request For Export Defendant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/398/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/398</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/398/comment-page-1#comment-20572</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=398#comment-20572</guid>
		<description>I wonder if he can sue the Thai or the US government for keeping him in prison for 2 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if he can sue the Thai or the US government for keeping him in prison for 2 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/398/comment-page-1#comment-20568</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=398#comment-20568</guid>
		<description>An administrative hearing, no matter how unpleasant, probably doesn&#039;t constitute torture within the meaning of the UN convention. . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An administrative hearing, no matter how unpleasant, probably doesn&#8217;t constitute torture within the meaning of the UN convention. . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/398/comment-page-1#comment-20567</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=398#comment-20567</guid>
		<description>He would face a hearing before a Coast Guard ALJ in addition and separate from the criminal proceeding, even if acquited of what used to be a specific-intent crime, and the Coast Guard ALJ has made clear that they follow government interpretations and policies instead of applying independent analysis of the regs, so I&#039;d say the Thai court is dead on. The folks at Gitmo ain&#039;t the only facing trial by military tribunal. With the new penalties under IEEPA, we&#039;re talking serious penalties.  Oh for the days of ALJ Dolan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He would face a hearing before a Coast Guard ALJ in addition and separate from the criminal proceeding, even if acquited of what used to be a specific-intent crime, and the Coast Guard ALJ has made clear that they follow government interpretations and policies instead of applying independent analysis of the regs, so I&#8217;d say the Thai court is dead on. The folks at Gitmo ain&#8217;t the only facing trial by military tribunal. With the new penalties under IEEPA, we&#8217;re talking serious penalties.  Oh for the days of ALJ Dolan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

