http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/397 Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/397/comment-page-1#comment-20576 Cheryl Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:15:00 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=397#comment-20576 My only comment is that now I have one more weekend project on my "to-do" list. Thanks! My only comment is that now I have one more weekend project on my “to-do” list. Thanks!

]]> http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/397/comment-page-1#comment-20566 Clif Burns Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:29:37 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=397#comment-20566 There is, of course, a good argument that EAR 734.7, which exempts certain published information from the scope of the EAR, would cover that, and my elaborate "warning" was meant to be slightly facetious and to underline the need for review of the ECCN. BUT, like its equivalent provision in the ITAR, 734.7 doesn't explicitly mention the Internet, an argument that DDTC has used to claim that technical data on the Internet may still be subject to export controls. There is, of course, a good argument that EAR 734.7, which exempts certain published information from the scope of the EAR, would cover that, and my elaborate “warning” was meant to be slightly facetious and to underline the need for review of the ECCN. BUT, like its equivalent provision in the ITAR, 734.7 doesn’t explicitly mention the Internet, an argument that DDTC has used to claim that technical data on the Internet may still be subject to export controls.

]]> http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/397/comment-page-1#comment-20565 Jim Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:23:24 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=397#comment-20565 I would think the schematics are now covered by 15 C.F.R. 734.7... I would think the schematics are now covered by 15 C.F.R. 734.7…

]]>