<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Shoe Falls on Eve of Roth Trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/381/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/381</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/381/comment-page-1#comment-20311</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=381#comment-20311</guid>
		<description>You have to wonder whether the company&#039;s counsel, who never handled an export case before, understood that by pleading guilty the company would be automatically debarred, and therefore essentially worthless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to wonder whether the company&#8217;s counsel, who never handled an export case before, understood that by pleading guilty the company would be automatically debarred, and therefore essentially worthless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

