<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Platte River Associates Mystery Deepens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/365/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/365</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/365/comment-page-1#comment-20661</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=365#comment-20661</guid>
		<description>Please publish this comment anonymously. The reason for this request is because of concern over government agencies&#039; persecution in this matter.  

There is much more to the story than meets the idea and it is worthy of a first rate investigative reporter&#039;s attention from a major national newspaper.  The basic story line is that a government agency got involved in this case sensing a &quot;big fish&quot; in an attempt to find national security issues in the feeding frenzy for such matters following 9/11.    When that situation did not materialize, and when the government realized that this was not a national security matter, rather than admit a mistake, the government agency dug its heals in deeper, and decided to continue to prosecute, despite the lack of seriousness of the situation.  The answer to your blog question as to &quot;why would someone plea guilty&quot; is easy to understand.  (1) To get the government prosecutors off one&#039;s back from pursuing these frivolous charges, and (2) to permit these government agencies, who have wasted MILLIONS of taxpayer dollars on this matter, to &quot;save face&quot; so that the matter can be ended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please publish this comment anonymously. The reason for this request is because of concern over government agencies&#8217; persecution in this matter.  </p>
<p>There is much more to the story than meets the idea and it is worthy of a first rate investigative reporter&#8217;s attention from a major national newspaper.  The basic story line is that a government agency got involved in this case sensing a &#8220;big fish&#8221; in an attempt to find national security issues in the feeding frenzy for such matters following 9/11.    When that situation did not materialize, and when the government realized that this was not a national security matter, rather than admit a mistake, the government agency dug its heals in deeper, and decided to continue to prosecute, despite the lack of seriousness of the situation.  The answer to your blog question as to &#8220;why would someone plea guilty&#8221; is easy to understand.  (1) To get the government prosecutors off one&#8217;s back from pursuing these frivolous charges, and (2) to permit these government agencies, who have wasted MILLIONS of taxpayer dollars on this matter, to &#8220;save face&#8221; so that the matter can be ended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

