<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Ambassador Implicated in Scheme to Conceal Origin of Chinese Ammo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/352/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/352</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: avahome</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/352/comment-page-1#comment-19630</link>
		<dc:creator>avahome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=352#comment-19630</guid>
		<description>South Carolina-based Southern Ammunition Co. Inc., or SACI - could they possibly have been involved in repackaging?  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Tirana_explosions

&quot;The US Company, after signing the contract with the MoD entrusted the work in the field to an Albanian subcontractor, “Alb-Demil”. But further related news stated that the U.S. company was repacking SALW ammunition and shipping it to Afghan National Army, on behalf a contract signed in U.S. on January 2007. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Carolina-based Southern Ammunition Co. Inc., or SACI &#8211; could they possibly have been involved in repackaging?  </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Tirana_explosions" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Tirana_explosions</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The US Company, after signing the contract with the MoD entrusted the work in the field to an Albanian subcontractor, “Alb-Demil”. But further related news stated that the U.S. company was repacking SALW ammunition and shipping it to Afghan National Army, on behalf a contract signed in U.S. on January 2007. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ivey</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/352/comment-page-1#comment-19628</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ivey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=352#comment-19628</guid>
		<description>Clif,

You always have the best stuff.  Thank you!  I would like to hear the State Department and the Ambassador explain why those facts, if true, would not be a violation as set out in ITAR 127.1(d) &quot;aid, abet, counsel&quot; etc. any act in violation of Section 38 of the AECA.

&quot;The horror.&quot;

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clif,</p>
<p>You always have the best stuff.  Thank you!  I would like to hear the State Department and the Ambassador explain why those facts, if true, would not be a violation as set out in ITAR 127.1(d) &#8220;aid, abet, counsel&#8221; etc. any act in violation of Section 38 of the AECA.</p>
<p>&#8220;The horror.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

