Comments on: Enternet Fined by BIS for Deemed Export Violations http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/191 Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Robot Economist http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/191/comment-page-1#comment-2861 Robot Economist Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:53:28 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/191#comment-2861 I have a fair amount of contact with the Bureau of Industrial Security on export control issues and they never strike me as very tech-savvy. They also have a number of restrictions on their computer systems -- including an obnoxious, but avoidable, firewall that strips all attachments. I have a fair amount of contact with the Bureau of Industrial Security on export control issues and they never strike me as very tech-savvy.

They also have a number of restrictions on their computer systems — including an obnoxious, but avoidable, firewall that strips all attachments.

]]> By: Clif Burns http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/191/comment-page-1#comment-2857 Clif Burns Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:45:10 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/191#comment-2857 I also think its simply a clerical problem rather than something intentional. Folks from BIS drop by here regularly so hopefully somebody will get it fixed. A missing link was fixed a while back shortly after we complained about it. I also think its simply a clerical problem rather than something intentional. Folks from BIS drop by here regularly so hopefully somebody will get it fixed. A missing link was fixed a while back shortly after we complained about it.

]]> By: Ladyx http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/191/comment-page-1#comment-2856 Ladyx Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:42:03 +0000 http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/191#comment-2856 I am glad to hear that I am not the only one that waits for these mega files to come up.... Previous to your comment, I had chalked this up to clerical scanning issue, I really didn't want to believe that the BIS would intentionally make it difficult for the public to access these documents. Has anyone asked BIS what is going on? I am glad to hear that I am not the only one that waits for these mega files to come up…. Previous to your comment, I had chalked this up to clerical scanning issue, I really didn’t want to believe that the BIS would intentionally make it difficult for the public to access these documents. Has anyone asked BIS what is going on?

]]>