<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OFAC Issues General License for Transactions with Palestinian Authority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/182/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/182</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott K.</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/182/comment-page-1#comment-2683</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/182#comment-2683</guid>
		<description>Agreed, the PLC list is not exhaustive.

Using the PLC list is, however further along the compliance continuum than &quot;A compliance officer might look at the list of sanctioned countries and the SDN list and never conclude that the Palestinian Authority or the Nepalese Government were sanctioned.&quot; 
The PLC list is separate from the SDN list, and I&#039;m often alarmed by the number of people who don&#039;t even know it exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, the PLC list is not exhaustive.</p>
<p>Using the PLC list is, however further along the compliance continuum than &#8220;A compliance officer might look at the list of sanctioned countries and the SDN list and never conclude that the Palestinian Authority or the Nepalese Government were sanctioned.&#8221;<br />
The PLC list is separate from the SDN list, and I&#8217;m often alarmed by the number of people who don&#8217;t even know it exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/182/comment-page-1#comment-2682</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/182#comment-2682</guid>
		<description>But even the NS-PLC list isn&#039;t a comprehensive list of parties affected by the constructive sanctions imposed on the Palestinian Authority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But even the NS-PLC list isn&#8217;t a comprehensive list of parties affected by the constructive sanctions imposed on the Palestinian Authority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott K.</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/182/comment-page-1#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/182#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>OFAC published a supplemental list, NS-PLC, or Palestinian Legislative Council list to be monitored in addition to the SDN lists. Transactions with entities on the list were to be rejected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OFAC published a supplemental list, NS-PLC, or Palestinian Legislative Council list to be monitored in addition to the SDN lists. Transactions with entities on the list were to be rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

