Comments on: DDTC Still Can’t Find Its Way With Inertial Navigational Chips

By: Chris Dressler

Chris Dressler — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:57:50 +0000

Sorry Clif. Maybe it is my program but it worked on Friday. Internet connections to RSS feed work fine but I keep getting “could not locate this feed online” on my mobile. All other subscribed feeds work fine????

By: Clif Burns

Clif Burns — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:34:50 +0000

Yep, I found it. It’s an error in WordPress. I fixed that and the feed validates now. I also think I found another problem that may have interfered with the feed. One of the comments was missing a close anchor tag which could also cause things to go awry. Let me know if this fixes it. Thanks for the heads up.

By: Chris Dressler

Chris Dressler — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:26:34 +0000

Has to do with the comments field in the QRS-11 story. Not real familiar with RSS. Says line 35. Something about RSS should read Rss???

By: Clif Burns

Clif Burns — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:20:51 +0000

Thanks, Chris. I’ll check and see what’s going on. Any idea of which comments?

By: Chris Dressler

Chris Dressler — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:17:12 +0000

Love the site Mr. Burns. Just wanted to draw your attention to one of the comments posted here is preventing RSS downloads. Checked via RSS validators. Keep up the great posts!

By: JKB

JKB — Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:45:27 +0000

Okay, the link html didn’t work. Looks like I missed a “>”. The company is Zupt. Looks like the link is there.

By: JKB

JKB — Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:05:47 +0000

Inertial Nav systems or more specifically the inertial measurement units in them are going to have to be dealt with. It isn't just the QSR-11 that is shrinking. Survey grade systems are backpack portable now. And most manufacturers aren't as clear as on the export controls on this technology. "The fastest way to go to jail (without passing go) will be to flaunt the export controls associated with this technology."

By: Mike Deal

Mike Deal — Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:05:45 +0000

Once again, DDTC acts as though it is a law unto itself. In this case it ignores Sec. 17(c)and (m) of the EAA, which supposedly are continued in force by Executive Order. Or is what the Administration telling us is that, in fact, the sections of the EAA that the administration finds inconvenient will be ignored.