<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BIS Issues Temporary Denial Order in Cirrus Electronics Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/174/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/174</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/174/comment-page-1#comment-2423</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/174#comment-2423</guid>
		<description>Whew, Mike!  I was getting worried there when you didn&#039;t mention the IEEPA issue in your first comment.  I thought you might have gone soft all of a sudden.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew, Mike!  I was getting worried there when you didn&#8217;t mention the IEEPA issue in your first comment.  I thought you might have gone soft all of a sudden.  <img src='http://www.exportlawblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/174/comment-page-1#comment-2422</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/174#comment-2422</guid>
		<description>Of course, I&#039;ll refrain from pointing out that there still is no statutory authority for a TDO under IEEPA and that at best, the government would have to find some way to bootstrap to get a court to issue a TRO or injunction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, I&#8217;ll refrain from pointing out that there still is no statutory authority for a TDO under IEEPA and that at best, the government would have to find some way to bootstrap to get a court to issue a TRO or injunction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/174/comment-page-1#comment-2414</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/174#comment-2414</guid>
		<description>And two of the company principals listed in the TDO are in jail.  But there are some other named individuals in the TDO, current or former employees of Cirrus or its affiliates, that are on the loose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And two of the company principals listed in the TDO are in jail.  But there are some other named individuals in the TDO, current or former employees of Cirrus or its affiliates, that are on the loose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/174/comment-page-1#comment-2413</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/174#comment-2413</guid>
		<description>It may be moot: Their web site is gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be moot: Their web site is gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

