<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloudy with a Chance of Fines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1187/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1187</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1187/comment-page-1#comment-96428</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1187#comment-96428</guid>
		<description>I just came across this story about Google&#039;s new contract for services with the City of Los Angeles.  One of the contract terms specifies that Google will &quot;guarantee that the data remains in the contiguous 48 states.&quot;

I wonder if this feature is available for companies as well as governments? Maybe Google is trying to address the &quot;cloud issue&quot; after all.  The full story is here:
http://ow.ly/1yNE1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across this story about Google&#8217;s new contract for services with the City of Los Angeles.  One of the contract terms specifies that Google will &#8220;guarantee that the data remains in the contiguous 48 states.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder if this feature is available for companies as well as governments? Maybe Google is trying to address the &#8220;cloud issue&#8221; after all.  The full story is here:<br />
<a href="http://ow.ly/1yNE1" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/1yNE1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Q. Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1187/comment-page-1#comment-92321</link>
		<dc:creator>John Q. Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1187#comment-92321</guid>
		<description>Perfect example of why 20th Century export control laws are woefully inadequate to handle 21st Century technologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect example of why 20th Century export control laws are woefully inadequate to handle 21st Century technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Madejski</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1187/comment-page-1#comment-92320</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Madejski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1187#comment-92320</guid>
		<description>Interesting to see how Personal Information will be managed. I would like to prevent my insurance company from sending my details outside of the European Union without my consent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to see how Personal Information will be managed. I would like to prevent my insurance company from sending my details outside of the European Union without my consent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

