<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whose Default Is It Anyway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/116/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/116</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExportLawBlog &#187; Where in the World Is William Kovacs?</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/116/comment-page-1#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>ExportLawBlog &#187; Where in the World Is William Kovacs?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/116#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>[...] In an earlier post, we took the Bureau of Industry and Security (&#8221;BIS&#8221;) to task for filing a default motion against William Kovacs to deny his export privileges even though he was in jail for his export violation and his ability to respond to BIS&#8217;s default motion would be, well, limited. We also felt pretty sure that BIS knew where he was, because BIS&#8217;s own reports on the case indicated that Kovacs had been incarcerated. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In an earlier post, we took the Bureau of Industry and Security (&#8221;BIS&#8221;) to task for filing a default motion against William Kovacs to deny his export privileges even though he was in jail for his export violation and his ability to respond to BIS&#8217;s default motion would be, well, limited. We also felt pretty sure that BIS knew where he was, because BIS&#8217;s own reports on the case indicated that Kovacs had been incarcerated. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mous, anony</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/116/comment-page-1#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>mous, anony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/116#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>Though it&#039;s hardly my field of law, it seems to me that incarceration might just be a mitigating factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though it&#8217;s hardly my field of law, it seems to me that incarceration might just be a mitigating factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

