<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Answered Prayers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1000/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1000</link>
	<description>Latest News on DDTC, BIS, OFAC, and other export law matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1000/comment-page-1#comment-92890</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1000#comment-92890</guid>
		<description>What do you make of the version of the rules revised by DTAG, at http://www.pmddtc.state.gov/DTAG/documents/Part129BrokeringComments.pdf?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you make of the version of the rules revised by DTAG, at <a href="http://www.pmddtc.state.gov/DTAG/documents/Part129BrokeringComments.pdf?" rel="nofollow">http://www.pmddtc.state.gov/DTAG/documents/Part129BrokeringComments.pdf?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Q. Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1000/comment-page-1#comment-92019</link>
		<dc:creator>John Q. Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1000#comment-92019</guid>
		<description>That jolly ol&#039; facilitator Santa Claus may want to seek legal counsel to determine if he should cancel his plans for December 24.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That jolly ol&#8217; facilitator Santa Claus may want to seek legal counsel to determine if he should cancel his plans for December 24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1000/comment-page-1#comment-92018</link>
		<dc:creator>V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1000#comment-92018</guid>
		<description>Clif, in one of your posts you discussed US jurisdiction over the entire planet claimed by an ex-treasury advisor.

Through extraterritoriality and brokering seems like we are accomplishing just that. The ITAR always has jursiduction over the goods and now also over foreign companies - sorry, I meant brokers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clif, in one of your posts you discussed US jurisdiction over the entire planet claimed by an ex-treasury advisor.</p>
<p>Through extraterritoriality and brokering seems like we are accomplishing just that. The ITAR always has jursiduction over the goods and now also over foreign companies &#8211; sorry, I meant brokers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1000/comment-page-1#comment-92017</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1000#comment-92017</guid>
		<description>The freight forwarder exemption from registration in 129.3(b)(3) remains in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The freight forwarder exemption from registration in 129.3(b)(3) remains in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jairo</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1000/comment-page-1#comment-92016</link>
		<dc:creator>Jairo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1000#comment-92016</guid>
		<description>What will happen with the Freight Forwarder (facilitating the transaction)? Needs to register with DDTC? Or the sole mention as a consignor on the license will suffice? Within the old definition of brokerage, the freight forwarder was excluded by DDTC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What will happen with the Freight Forwarder (facilitating the transaction)? Needs to register with DDTC? Or the sole mention as a consignor on the license will suffice? Within the old definition of brokerage, the freight forwarder was excluded by DDTC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Mc Guinn</title>
		<link>http://www.exportlawblog.com/archives/1000/comment-page-1#comment-92015</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Mc Guinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exportlawblog.com/?p=1000#comment-92015</guid>
		<description>It seems like a catch-all situation and is positively revenue motivated (Ohh the mighty dollar), what will they think of next!!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like a catch-all situation and is positively revenue motivated (Ohh the mighty dollar), what will they think of next!!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

